Aerospace 1999
Variability Reduction: A Common Ground for Integration of Advanced
Quality Tools and Processes by David Novick, Technical Advisor
Electronic Systems & Missile Defense, The Boeing Company. A strong Variability
Reduction (VR) plan is central to any organizational Continuous Quality or
Process Improvement (CQI/CPI) effort. Without such a plan sorely needed
resources, people and budget, are applied in the wrong place and at the wrong
time. A "Total Approach" may be fashioned to guide planning, developing and
managing such a program using a toolkit developed and selected from
Comprehensive QFD (QD and QFD), Taguchi Methods (Robust Design and Loss
Function), Theory of Constraints (TOC and TP), Theory of Inventive Problem
Solving (TRIZ), Statistical Process Control (Shewhart's SPC) and Kaizen. This
paper presents how this author used these toolkits to establish a Variability
Reduction Plan and Pathway.
Architecture 1999
The Use of QFD for Architectural Briefing & Design by Dirk
Conradie, Project Leader & Kirsten Kusel, Research Architect Division of
Building Technology, CSIR, South Africa. A unique fusion of technology in an
unprecedented new system promises new possibilities in the complex world of
architectural briefing and design. The system enables actual client
requirements to be accurately translated by means of a new software system
into architectural functions and final design solutions. The application of
novel concepts such as QFD-in-depth and breakout methodologies will be
illustrated. The paper describes the integration of the new QFD concepts with
traditional methodologies from the domains of QFD and Systems Engineering and
Concurrent Engineering within a software environment.
Automotive 1999
QFD for Manufacturing Technology Assessment by Edward Vinarcik, Engineer, Visteon Powertrain Control Systems. Choosing a manufacturing technology is difficult. Customer needs as well as technology limitations must be understood. This paper presents a case study in which QFD is used as an analysis method for evaluating manufacturing technologies for a specific product, automotive fuel rails. Included is a discussion of customer types and needs related to design, cost, delivery, and timing.
QFD Applications in Brazilian Autoparts Companies by Paulo
Cauchick Miguel, P.T.M. deSouza, & C.J. deSouza, Quality Management &
Metrology Group - Methodist University of Piracicaba (UNIMEP), Meritor do
Brasil Ltda. - LVS Division, & Eaton Ltda. - Divisão de Transmissões. This
paper describes QFD implementation initiatives carried out in two auto parts
companies in Brazil. One company produces steel wheels and the other
mechanical transmissions. The paper describes the framework and timetable to
implement QFD, highlights the reasons for deciding to implement it, and it
shows the results achieved so far. Difficulties experienced are also presented
as well as the principal benefits.
The Product Development Process: Avoiding Pitfalls to a Successful
Implementation by Bob Adams, Magna Seating Systems. Organizations that
utilize product and program management have consistently found difficulty in
delivering on customer expectations while attempting to balance internal
resources. Cost overruns and losses associated with un-recovered engineering
changes are symptomatic of a process that doesn't work. Magna Seating Systems
embarked on a concerted effort to revitalize the entire operation of
delivering products from concept through obsolescence. What resulted is a
process that has become world class in execution and achievement of both
customer and company goals. This was accomplished by taking the architecture
and designing into its basic framework safeguards that avoid common pitfalls
that have plagued other companies. Changing the way things occurred and
happened at Magna began a cultural revolution in program management and its
execution that continues to this day.
QFD in Strategic Planning: An Exploratory Study by Paulo
Cauchick Miguel & R.M. Vanalle Quality Management & Metrology Group, Methodist
University of Piracicaba (UNIMEP) A.G. Alves Filho, University of Saõ Carlos,
Brazil. This paper examines an exploratory study in which QFD is used for
strategic planning formulation. On the basis of corporate strategies obtained
in a previous study, QFD matrices are applied to relate business strategies
and functional level strategies. The case study is performed in an automotive
industry supplier which produces brake systems. A QFD matrix is used to
identify the most appropriate functional strategies, including the
relationships and correlations.
Consumer-Based™ Performance Benchmarking by Kioumars Paryani
and Terry Zalewski, General Motors Corporation GM Truck Group, Vehicle
Integration Engineering. The authors of this paper present a unique approach
to benchmarking and target setting. The paper will not get into the discussion
of how to capture, prioritize or translate the voice of the customer. The
assumptions are that an accurate translation of customer needs and wants is in
place. The theme of the paper centers around a new methodology for setting
performance targets for the product characteristics, initially and throughout
the lifecycle of the product. Additionally, this methodology will identify
areas that need to be technologically developed. This way, technology
development takes on a market pull strategy rather than the traditional
strategy of developing technology for technology sake. Furthermore, the
methodology quantifies the level performance needed by the technology to
ultimately exceed customer expectations. Tools utilized in this methodology
are derived from established quality engineering practices and tools, such as
the Taguchi Quality Loss Function, Quality Function Deployment, Focus Group
Methodology in consumer research, and the critical path method (CPM).
Crisis and Disaster
Management 1999
The Application of Augmented QFD to the Evaluation of Emergency Plans
by Chakib Kara-Zaitri & S. Al-Daihan, University of Bradford, UK and King
Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Saudi Arabia. A description of an
augmented Quality Function Deployment (QFD) methodology for the evaluation of
emergency and crisis management is developed and presented. The methodology
identifies those areas of management response which are critical for the
correct implementation of emergency plans. The methodology is presented by
reference to illustrative examples derived from recent disaster response
plans. The methodology is shown to be efficient, flexible and easy to use.
Communications and Media
1999
Contextual Usability, Domestication & QFD by Derek Nicoll,
Research Fellow, The University of Edinburgh Management School. QFD works well
where there are strong product analogues easily recognized by representative
samples of consumer-users. However, what happens if there is a lack of
analogues providing the crucial metric? What if there is no easily definable
representative sample? This paper considers the importance of context in
capturing the voice of the customer, and enhancing it with information on how
products domesticate into homes and offices.
Consumer Products 1999
Brand Engineering using Kansei Engineering and QFD by Glenn
Mazur, Industrial and Operations Engineering and Jeremy Brochtner,
Interdisciplinary Program in Engineering and Industrial Design, University of
Michigan. Traditional QFD methods have dealt with issues such as "appearance"
for many years. But another, less known tool, kansei engineering is more
suited for the task of translating "brand" into real product differentiators.
Born in Japan like QFD, kansei engineering is the brainchild of Mituso
Nagamachi, a leading ergonomist and quality professional. This paper will
integrate kansei engineering with brand management, industrial design, QFD,
and other quality tools to yield a more robust approach that can bring
together the marketing, art, and engineering professions.
Education and Library
Sciences 1999
Model Improvement Process in an Educational Environment by
Brian S titt, User Support Systems Specialist and John Sinn, Executive Director
Center for Quality, Measurement & Automation (CQMA), Bowling Green State
University. QFD problem investigation and solving processes cannot be
optimized without the introduction of teams and problems. A modified QFD
problem solving methodology was used by student teams to evaluate and improve
a Technology course at Bowling Green State University. The research details
how student teams used the QFD methodology to research, develop, and implement
the plan to progressively deliver an improved Technology course in an on-line
format.
The Application of QFD Principles to Student Learning using a Group
Decision Support System in School Education by Wilhelmina Hunt,
Reading Insight, Australia. This paper describes how through the use of a
Group Decision Support System customer in schools (students) apply QFD
principles to the their learning. The students are able to develop a product
that meets or exceeds their needs or wants. Teachers use Group Decision
Support System to do long term strategy to satisfy the goals of their
customers (students).
Solving Problems with Method of the Ideal Result (MIR) by
Iouri Belski, Department of Communication and Electronic Engineering, RMIT
University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. This paper introduces an
application of Method of the Ideal Result (MIR) to service. MIR is based on
the TRIZ concept of the Ideal Final Result (IFR) and can be effectively used
for service development and evaluation. This paper concentrates on a general
MIR methodology, its relation with TRIZ and QFD. MIR application in finding
ways of improvement of university student's satisfaction is presented as an
example.
Improving the Scales Used in AHP for QFD by Frank Moisiadis,
Centre for Advanced Systems Engineering, Macquarie University, Australia. The
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is widely used in QFD for prioritizing
stakeholders, their needs, competitors, and other data. Studies done in the
field of Library Sciences and MBA education have revealed certain weaknesses
in Dr. Saaty’s 9-point scale, since many psychologists believe people do not
mentally perceive attitudes as a single point, but rather as a range of
acceptable values. Findings and alternatives will be presented.
Electronics, Computers,
and Telecommunications 1999
Interpretation of VOC with Concept of Quality in Multi-Levels: An
Enhancement for QFD for Innovation by Chong Pui-yik, Steven School of
Design, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. With too much change and newness
of attributes, it is hard to thoroughly implement QFD for innovation. A view
is raised in this paper that the concept of quality in multi-levels, Owen’s
Quality Pyramid Model, can be used to establish the usable information of
desired quality attributes as enhancement to turn the vibration of voice of
customer (VoC) into certain manageable newness. Thus the context of QFD for
product innovation can be extended.
Deploying Corporate Vision using a Structured Methodology by
Steve Seeman, Director of Quality Assurance EFData & Alan Leeds, EFData
Subsidiary of California Microwave. Challenged by a newly appointed CEO to
improve operating cost and increase customer satisfaction, California
Microwave embarked on three initiatives to achieve quantum improvements toward
world class operating levels: 1) Develop and deploy a methodology that would
provide focus for each employee and link activities throughout the
organization. A Hoshin planning process was adopted to achieve this objective.
2) Define and initiate scorecards in the areas of quality, operations and
engineering. This allowed bas- lining current performance levels and would be
used to monitor trends, track improvement and set goals and take actions based
on benchmark world class operations. 3) Implement a customer satisfaction
survey and corrective action process. A customized software program was
developed to access customers opinions. Responses from customers resulted in
identifying and forming teams to address the top three attributes. Results
included focus on real customer needs, reduced non-value added activities,
improved quality, and shorter cycle times.
Interface of Lanchester Strategy & QFD by John Schuler,
Lanchester Press. Brief overview of Lanchester Strategy, Lanchester Equations,
Lanchester's principle of concentration, Koopmans global warfare and
development in Japan of total marketing warfare. Significance of the Japanese
development in application to other fields of activity, military, marketing,
politics and understanding of individual achievements - the "performance guru
model." Advances over the popular "Sun-Tu" model of marketing. Explanations of
gaps in popular texts such as the Moore series on product introduction. Cases
discussed include HP-Xerox-Canon in a fight over the copier market and mergers
and acquisitions in the CMP sector of the semiconductor market.
Entertainment 1999
Jurassic QFD by Andrew Bolt, MD Robotics and Glenn Mazur,
Japan Business Consultants, Ltd. Universal Studios Florida has just opened its
Jurassic Park amusement park. One of the highlights is the Triceratops
Encounter, a "live" animatronic interactive dinosaur "petting zoo." The
animatronics were built by the company that makes the robot arm for the Space
Shuttle, and you can imagine the difficulty in moving from that industry to an
amusement attraction. QFD allowed them to move from the original concept story
boards to system and component development to operator instructions for the on
site "attendant." Hear a gemba visit story only QFD could have created.
Further, significant time and cost savings were achieved due the focus that
QFD brings. One visitor called this "totally convincing... it flinches,
breathes, snorts, drools, moves, blinks just like it were alive." You won't
believe what other body functions it does! We hope to have a video of the
design, build, and execution process.
General 1999
Hoshin Planning, QFD & TQM by Robert Hunt, Director, Centre
for Management Innovation and Technology, Graduate School of Management,
Macquarie University, Australia. QFD, Hoshin Kanri and related methodologies
are often considered to be at the opposite end of the spectrum from
traditional Management By Objectives approaches to management. From field
analysis of 47 organizations, this paper develops a diagnostic that positions
an organization’s strategic planning system along this spectrum. It then goes
on to use the diagnostic to provide some important insights into the
relationship between success, and the adoption of quality principles, hoshin
kanri and QFD.
QFD as a Corporate Memory Structure by Greald Henstra,
Faculty of Management and Organization, University of Groningen, The
Netherlands. Parallel to creating products the R&D process results in
knowledge. Usually a great deal of this knowledge remains tacit. Tacit
knowledge obviously is a concealed source of competitive advantage. To reveal
their findings employees need a means of communication. QFD will be suggested
to serve as a communication structure, incidentally upgrading its role within
the play of product development.
Experiences with the reliability and Validity of the Kano Method:
Comparison to Alternate Forms of Classification of Product Requirements
by Elmar Saurwein, Assistant Professor, Department of Management,
University of Innsbruck, Austria. Reliability and validity of the Kano Model
have not yet been tested thoroughly. This paper tries to examine the
reliability of test-retest, alternate forms and stability of interpretation.
Furthermore concurrent, predictive and convergent validity were tested. Other
methods of classification were tested, too. The results are supportive for the
Kano model.
Making QFD Efficient by R
obert
H ales, P
ro A ction De
velopment.
This paper will present the sometimes-heretical lessons that the author
learned by applying QFD over nine years with essentially the same team and on
multiple product generations. It will cover preparing for market research,
collection and prioritization of requirements, the use of QFD matrices, target
setting for product differentiation, and design concept creation and
selection.
The Politics and Partisanship of VOC by M. Larry Shillito.
Today and the next decade will be the decade of the customer. Next generation
strategic thinking will be concerned with, "which customers will get us into
the future?" and "How will we excite them?" Acquiring processing and deploying
Voice of the Customer (VOC) will be paramount to the success of an enterprise.
VOC is the engine that triggers the entire QFD process. Obtaining good VOC is
not easy because it involves people, teams, organization structure, emotions,
politics, and power plays, all of which add complexity to and compound the
process. The success of a VOC project is enhanced if organizational, political
and behavioral aspects of the project are addressed early. Interdisciplinary
teams are indispensable to the success of a VOC project. We must understand
how the various disciplines process information and view the customer chain in
order to provide a common understanding and forge a unidirectional effort to
obtain good VOC. This paper will discuss the company-customer balance, VOC
principles, vertical VOC, evolutionary/revolutionary VOC, customer chains,
supply-demand model of VOC, VOC fit to the commercialization process, and acid
test questions for initiating a VOC study.
Industrial Products and
Heavy Industry 1999
Customer Chart: An Efficient and Effective Way for Structuring
Customer Needs by Juergen Hoffmann, Head of Department, Fraunhofer
Technology Development Group, Germany. Since customer needs are the vital
input for any QFD process Fraunhofer TEG has developed a new promising method
for structuring customer groups and their needs. Combining elements of the
Akao with the well-known ASI approach a new effective and efficient way for
dealing with diverse customer needs of different target groups is achieved.
Application of QFD in Conjunction with the Goal Function Modeling
within the Automation Systems Industry by Prof. Tilo Pfeifer &
Dipl.-Ing Rolf Reinecke, Laboratory for Machine Tools and Production
Engineering (WZL), Aachen University of Technology, Germany. This approach
changes the way automation systems are engineered with the specific purpose of
reducing cost and enhancing quality of the delivered systems, thus, leading to
excellent customer satisfaction. This paper presents a combined customer and
functional oriented methodology based on QFD and Goal Function Modeling (GFM)
as well as the first results of application on real life automation projects.
Socially Responsible QFD by Jo
hn T e
rnin ko, Re
sponsible Man agement, Inc.,
USA. Centuries ago, the Seneca Nation of northeastern North
America made decisions by considering the consequences for the seventh unborn
generation of their people. It is time to apply this ancient wisdom to our own
times with the aid of 21st Century tools like QFD and TRIZ. By looking at the
needs of the super-system in which a product, service or software resides –
the super Gemba, so to speak – the probability of future environmental and
health disasters will be minimized. A combined methodology using both QFD and
TRIZ is proposed to achieve this higher level perspective.
Using Soft Systems to Identify and Diffuse Cross Functional
Conflicts by Jim McMahon, Fresh Venture Limited, UK. Should the
marketers dictate requirements to the manufacturing function, or should
operations limit what can be brought to the market? Marketing may give
undertakings to customers that operations just cannot accommodate. These
undertakings may include lead times and delivery quantities incompatible with
the manufacturing system. There exists therefore the potential for conflict.
The successful resolution of these conflicts is important for the long and
short-term success of organizations.
Basic Elements of QFD as Key Factors in Life Cycle Engineering
by Christiane Rauch-Geelhaar, Manager and Frank Zeihsel, Institute of
Manufacturing Engineering and Production Management University of
Kaiserslautern, Germany. Although QFD evidently is a very good method for
transforming ambiguous customer demands into concrete measures for product and
processes there are still problems with its usage. Success strongly depends on
flexible application of the most important elements of QFD. These are key
factors for several kinds of requirement transformations not only in product
development but also in the whole product life cycle. In this article the
basic elements of QFD, their successful application in industrial practice as
well as useful enhancements are described.
Logistics 1999
Aligning the IT Framework to Corporate Strategy by Thomas
Fehlmann, IT Quality Group, Switzerland. New Lanchester strategy and QFD are
used in an integrated approach to define standards for the IT framework in
large organizations. The standardization approach is based on competitive
advantage, user needs, security policy and technology selection. We measure
productivity gains using an enhanced Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) – model in
medium to large distribution centers to retail businesses and in public
administration.
Software 1999
Risk-based Deployment of Standard Software Rollout Processes
by Dr. Georg Herzwurm, University of Cologne, QFD Institut Deutschland e. V.
and Dr. Wolfram Pietsch, ExperTeam GmbH, QFD Institut Deutschland e. V.
Germany. QFD is employed to the tailoring of rollout processes. The risk of
project failure is evaluated by means of a set of risk factors. The result is
used to select the tasks that address the risk properly, leading to an
efficient rollout process.
Defining Customer Needs for Brand New Products by Richard
Zultner, Zultner & Company. Is it useful to have an approach for products the
customer has never seen before (as opposed to model upgrades)? This paper will
review the existing approaches in QFD for brand new products, and discuss the
Theory of Constraints "Snowflake" and "3 Clouds" methods for finding the
customer's core problem, and core conflict, respectively. This will show the
synergy between TOC and QFD as well (tweaking the deal vs. tweaking the
details).
Training and Consulting 1999
How to Measure the Performance of the Overall Deployment Process
by Fatih Yenginol, Research Assistant and Ali Sen, Associate Professor,
Dokuz Eylul University, Turkey. Various forms of deployment processes are
being used to solve specific problems in different situations. At the end of
these applications, a performance measurement of the overall deployment
process has to be made. Thus, a backward revision deployment may be realized.
With this paper; a model is proposed for performance measurement and revision
of the overall deployment process.
A Statistical Approach to SQC Target-Setting by Kaushik
Ghosh, Principal Research Scientist and Lynnette Blaney, Research Scientist,
Systems Analysis and Engineering Group, Battelle Memorial Institute. The basic
premise of the House of Quality is an implied cause and effect between the
Substitute Quality Characteristics and customer satisfaction. Little is
usually done to verify this impact mathematically. As a result, target setting
is very subjective in nature and may be of very limited value. We present a
statistical model for use in target setting and an alternative calculation for
Technical Importance based on "satisfaction-sensitivities."
Training and Instructional Techniques for Teaching QFD by K. B eck
er, B eck
er Ass ociates. At some point in a QFD practitioner's life,
he or she will be asked to conduct a class in QFD. This presentation will
cover planning for training and instructional techniques based both on
classical learning theories (Blooms Taxonomy) and on new ideas to increase the
effectiveness of materials and the instructor's ability to build group
rapport.
Virtual QFD; Better Comprehensive QFD Training by D.
L yman, Vie
wP oint & Und
erstanding En hancement. This paper discusses the
different options for teaching Comprehensive QFD, looking at the primary three
axes of Depth, Time, and Applicability. These three axes give eight different
scenarios for instruction. All eight will be discussed briefly, as they are
based in the corner of real and the corner of unreal. An option called Virtual
QFD will be explored in detail. It offers a way to quickly train users in
comprehensive QFD, correctly meeting the needs for appropriate depth (many
matrices) and applicability, all without using very much of a team's valuable
time. When to use Virtual QFD is also explored.
TRIZ/Medical Device 1999
Using TRIZ as a Creative Process for Breaking Patterns by Tore Wiik, Senior Scientist, Sintef, Norway. Two successful cases in which TRIZ has been used extensively are discussed. Triz has first been used as a tool to stimulate group creativity so that a large number of alternatives have been generated. Then the methodology has been used as a tool to find actual solutions using the classical TRIZ tools for sterilizing equipment for drugs and next generation cutting tool holders.
More Abstracts
1999 (you are here now)
QFD Institute home page