The QFD Institute Logo, the official source for QFD, www.qfdi.org

QFD Institute

The official source for QFD.

Free QFD Newsletter
Email  

Sample | Privacy          


 

Home

Training

QFD Gold Belt®

QFD Green Belt®

QFD Black Belt®

Quality Methods

Calendar

Public Courses

2008 Symposium

What is QFD

Case Studies

Free Newsletter

Reference Books

QFD Software

QFD Student Pack

Add QFDI to your favorite news feeds. To use this feature, an RSS reader or aggregator is required.

About Us

What We Do

Akao Prize

Scholarship

Affiliations

Press Release

Contact Us

...........................

 

QFDI-published tutorial materials and articles on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) (partial list)

 

2000 Tutorials (ISBN1-889477-82-6)    Order Form

Lead User Research
Strategic Hoshin Planning
Principles of TRIZ and How to Enhance QFD
Project Schedule Reduction with QFD
Prioritizing Customer Needs Using AHP
Kansei Engineering
QFD for Health Care
QFD for Service
Introduction to Vale Engineering (VE) and Function Analysis (FA)

1997 Tutorials (ISBN1-889477-77-X)   Order Form
Introduction to QFD
Voice of Customer Analysis
Blitz QFD with AHP
Creativity Toolbox
TRIZ
ARIZ

1995 Tutorials (ISBN1-889477-75-3)    Order Form
Introduction to QFD
Voice of Customer Analysis
TRIZ
Taguchi Methods and QFD
Prioritizing in QFD with AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process)
Creativity Tools and Techniques
 

View All Proceedings
 



Papers on AHP

 

From the 1998 Proceedings    Order Form


Selecting the Best Direction to Create the Ideal Product Design by Dr. John Terninko of Responsible Management. The number of practitioners who go beyond remapping customer information into engineering information by using the House of Quality matrix is slowly increasing. Few try function analysis, reliability deployment or use the negative feedback of the gemba. This paper presents the integration of failure modes and function analysis to identify breakthrough development concepts. Reduction in the failure modes and increases in reliability are natural consequences. AHP prioritizes the projects using the priorities from the House of Quality. The driving force is the ideal final result as defined by the function associated with the most important performance measure in the House of Quality.

 

From the 1996 Proceedings    Order Form


Making the Millennium Decision: Applying QFD to the year 2000 Century Change Issue by William J. Jagrowski, Andersen Consulting; Robert L. Pike, Consumers Power Company (USA). The century change date poses one of the greatest development challenges ever for software engineering. Literally, billions of lines of software code will have to be evaluated and extended pulling developers away from developing new software products. This lost production may never be regained. QFD has helped a major utility develop its strategy for next few years to cope. The case study offers an example of how QFD and the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) techniques can be used to facilitate a decision facing a company grappling with legacy system obsolescence, including the Year 2000 problem.

 

From the 1995 Proceedings    Order Form


Determination of Design Parameters Using QFD,
Anwar-ul Islam and Ming C. Liu, Wichita State University. This research paper proposes a methodology that combines various customer inputs through Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and multi-attribute utility function to provide a sound theoretical basis for determining product design parameters. A linear programming model is developed to maximize customer satisfaction and to optimize design parameters that satisfy customer attributes.
 

From the 1993 Proceedings    Order Form

 

Priorities: the Analytical Hierechy Process in QFD, Richard Zutner & Company. An approach is presented for applying an Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Quality Function Deployment to improve the accuracy of priorities and make QFD better fit particular projects. A more accurate development of priorities can be accomplished by the consistent use of ratio scales, such as produced by the AHP, throughout QFD. The Figures presented illustrate the application of these concepts to the A-1/House of Quality matrix.
 

From the 1991 Proceedings    Order Form


Before the House: The Voices of the Customer, Richard E. Zultner, Zultner & Company. An approach is presented for applying QFD to complex products and services with multiple types of customers. This "customer deployment" occurs before the A-1 or "House of Quality" matrix. In addition to enhancing the ability of developers to hear the "voices of the customers" more clearly, a more accurate deployment of weights can be accomplished by the consistent use of ratio scales, such as produced by the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) throughout QFD. The figures presented also illustrate the mini-matrix method - a series of simple matrices and tables providing an easy-to-learn but very extensive, tailor-able structure for QFD. some guidance is provided for applying these concepts to the A-1/House of Quality itself, and beyond.


View All Proceedings
 


 

Published Book


Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World
by Thomas Saaty.



 

QFD Institute Home    |    Training    |    Public Courses   |    Symposium    |    Case Studies    |   Contact Us

QFD Gold Belt®, QFD Green Belt®, QFD Black Belt®, QFD Red Belt®, and Blitz QFD® are registered marks of the QFD Institute. 

Copyright 2000-2008 © QFD Institute.  All rights reserved.