|
These are some of the most frequently asked
questions that we receive from readers. For example:
“As a new QFD lead, I am looking for better ways for our company
to promote and apply QFD in our product development. Can you give
some directions how QFD should be different for today’s business?”
“Our company in Japan has been doing traditional QFD basically the
same way since we learned it three decades ago. What are we
missing that other global players know about Modern QFD?”
“I am a Six Sigma Black Master Belt. Should I be trained in modern
QFD methods even though I already know traditional QFD? ”
"Your article said, 'the
same analysis could be done using more agile and easier-to-use
tools such as the Maximum Value Table and without building a House
of Quality matrix.'
How?
I was not aware that QFD analysis can be done without making the
House of Quality table."
These are important questions. Modern QFD offers the
following advantages:
-
Traditional
QFD was extracted from Japanese Comprehensive QFD by the U.S.
auto industry in the 1980s for build-to-OEM-print
applications. Companies that do their own design work —
including part suppliers today, end product manufacturers,
service, software, food and chemical products, etc. — have
found that the Traditional 4-House approach does not integrate
well into their new product development process and is too
time-consuming.
Modern QFD is custom-tailored to identify the
minimum QFD effort required with the optimum tools and
sequence, making QFD more efficient and sustainable in today’s
lean business environment.
-
Traditional QFD required much time to make a series of complex
charts. This was fine decades ago when global competition was
not anywhere near today’s level and in Japan where lifetime
employment practice allowed companies to dedicate abundant
manpower to create comprehensive matrices. Today’s businesses,
however, face limited resources and faster time-to-market
pressures from both customers and competitors.
Modern QFD
is based on the Blitz QFD® method, which replaces large,
complex tools such as the House of Quality (HOQ) with smaller,
faster ones that deliver the major benefits with better focus
on critical customer needs—all the way from the initial
marketing plan to design and development to build and
delivery.
In some cases, the HOQ matrix may be still called for, of
course, and we do teach it in our courses. For today’s
practitioner, however, the important thing is to know when HOQ
is appropriate and when it is too much team effort for the
value it delivers.
-
Traditional QFD did not go deep enough into
the Voice of Customer analysis, since the OEM engineers were
responsible for design and there was no need to go beyond the
stated customer requirement.
Modern QFD
has a set of rigorous front-end tools to refine the Voice of
the Customer into
both
spoken
and
unspoken customer needs. As a result, customer needs are now
more precisely defined to lead to more innovative
solutions—which is what today’s businesses seek.
-
Traditional QFD does not achieve the statistical rigor that
Six Sigma demands. It uses ordinal scale numbers improperly
for math. For example, if
you use a customer rating or sales point of “5”
on the 5-point rating system
to compute your Customer Importance and Competitive
Assessments in your Quality Planning Table or House of Quality
matrix, your results would be mathematically invalid; your
downstream QFD deployments are also suspect.
Customer ratings and sales point numerals are called ordinal
scale numbers, which tell us in what order the items are but nothing
about how intervals are related. For example, if a customer rates something a “4” on the 5-point scale,
does that mean it is twice as important as an item rated as a
“2”? The answer is, we cannot tell.
Modern QFD has corrected this by using ratio scale math. This
also allows customers to measure their satisfaction in
whatever way they find appropriate, and still allow us to
convert these to product measures necessary for design.
-
Modern
QFD
includes psychological and lifestyle needs, not just
functional needs. In some product segments, consumers are
making the purchase decision more and more on emotional needs
and images. Lifestyle QFD connects consumers’ needs for
psychological and lifestyle-enhancing solutions with your
product development and branding.
-
Modern
QFD
includes project schedule reduction methods. Traditional QFD
ignores bottlenecks caused by availability of certain experts.
It assumed that experts were always available or would work
overtime to finish projects. Modern QFD uses Schedule
Deployment and Project Deployment based on
Critical Chain
Project Management to improve allocation of constrained
resources and finish more projects on time.
-
Modern QFD provides a better
framework for integration of other innovative methods into
your product development process including
TRIZ.
|
|
Your business faces a much different environment from even
five years ago. At the QFD Institute we continue to draw on
advancements through on-going research and education to
support you.
The benefit to those who attend our
QFD Belt Courses is the cutting-edge QFD knowledge and
application technology that we share. Our courses include
Modern QFD templates for these new tools and math.
Past attendees can
update their knowledge and get semi-private coaching through the annual
QFD Green Belt® Update Course and
QFD Black Belt®
Update Course
whenever they would like and
receive a complete set of the latest QFD Belt training
materials.
|
|
|